Published on November 25, 2019
- Types of therapies for CLL.
- How blood cells are affected by different drugs.
- Sequencing and combining agents for individualized care.
Expert Edward Faber joined Patient Power at a recent Town Meeting in Cincinnati, Ohio to discuss treatment options for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) including traditional chemotherapy, immunotherapy and novel inhibitors. Dr. Faber also shares where research is today on sequencing and combining agents to give patients more individualized care. Watch now to learn more.
This program is sponsored by AbbVie, Inc, Genentech, Inc and Adaptive Biotechnologies. These organizations have no editorial control. It is produced by Patient Power in partnership with The Leukemia & Lymphoma Society (LLS), CLL Society and OHC (Oncology Hematology Care). Patient Power is solely responsible for program content.
As a CLL patient, I appreciate all you do for this community. I was diagnosed in January 2014. I am in watch and wait. I am an RN, wife and grandma - and 66 years old. I always recommend you to anyone that is diagnosed or needs help for a family member.
You might also like
Transcript | Sequencing Novel Agents for CLL
Please remember the opinions expressed on Patient Power are not necessarily the views of our sponsors, contributors, partners or Patient Power. Our discussions are not a substitute for seeking medical advice or care from your own doctor. That’s how you’ll get care that’s most appropriate for you.
What is the difference between a chemotherapy agent, an immunotherapy agent, and these novel inhibitors and small molecules?
Absolutely, Jeff. To me, state-of-the-art is a perspective, and what we have are general chemotherapy agents like fludarabines (Fludara) and cyclophosphamide (Cytoxan) that you see there. When I used to teach med students and residents, we had an auditorium and how do our drugs work? I would say; imagine on the side doors that somebody came in with a hose and started spraying the room. A lot of you would get wet. Some of you are pretty quick, and you’d get behind the seat and you would stay dry. That’s kind of how our chemotherapy, like fludarabines and cyclophosphamide; it’s not very directive. It’s general, and so now instead of trying to affect the cell from a general aspect a blood cell is a sphere and it has proteins and there are antibodies like rituximab (Rituxan) and obinutuzumab (Gazyva), and it recognizes these proteins on the surface.
We had good success with the introduction of these monoclonal antibodies, and then as we learned more, when not everyone in a clinical trial responded the same way or in life; then we started to look inside the cell. Inside the cell we have a surface and we have another little sphere called a nucleus. There are pathways and the ways that cells communicate to live and die. Medicines like Ibrutinib and idelalisib (Zydelig) and venetoclax (Venclexta); the way that CLL cells have an advantage to grow after being signaled from the outside, these drugs address that and so to me, as I’ve said state-of-the-art is a perspective because we still have older therapies that work extremely well. We have newer agents that come to the front and then we learn more about further science that helps.
To me, there’s this ebb and tide of; we have traditional chemotherapy, we have immunotherapy, we have targeted therapy, we have novel agents depending on how you think of that, and really we restructure and juggle those so to speak. If you look on clinicaltrials.gov today you will see all versions of monoclonal antibodies and immunotherapies, and checkpoint inhibitors, so really as you circulate and find these combinations, to me that’s exciting because as everyone in the room here and online, it really can be individualized care. How do we sequence and how do we combine these agents to maybe be as good as FCR?